![]() |
||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ACLU v. AlaskaACLU v. Alaska, In this case, plaintiffs are attempting to convince the Alaska courts to interpret the state constitution to require that employment benefits provided to spouses of public employees be made available to same-sex partners of public employees. In order to do so, the court must accept plaintiffs’ claim that the constitutional amendment defining marriage, which was adopted in November 1998 applies only to the status of marriage and not to its benefits. This case was decided on November 16, 2001. The Court rejected arguments suggesting that the Alaska Constitution required the extension of marital benefits to same-sex couples while explicitly denying marital status. Current Status Case Files
|
||||||||
| Copyright © 2001 - 2009 The Catholic University of America. | ||||||||
![]() |
||||||||